Contesting the presence of wheat in the British Isles 8,000 years ago by assessing ancient DNA authenticity from low-coverage dataClemens L Weiß Michael Dannemann Kay Prüfer Hernán A Burbano
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany
Published November 3, 2015
AbstractContamination with exogenous DNA is a constant hazard to ancient DNA studies, since their validity greatly depend on the ancient origin of the retrieved sequences. Since contamination occurs sporadically, it is fundamental to show positive evidence for the authenticity of ancient DNA sequences even when preventive measures to avoid contamination are implemented. Recently the presence of wheat in the United Kingdom 8000 years before the present has been reported based on an analysis of sedimentary ancient DNA (Smith et al. 2015). Smith et al. did not present any positive evidence for the authenticity of their results due to the small number of sequencing reads that were confidently assigned to wheat. We developed a computational method that compares postmortem damage patterns of a test dataset with bona fide ancient and modern DNA. We applied this test to the putative wheat DNA and find that these reads are most likely not of ancient origin.
Thanks to Martyn Barber for pointing this article out to me.
" We developed a computational method that compares postmortem damage patterns of a test dataset with bona fide ancient and modern DNA" - new method which is untested at present!! Sadly, not being archaeologists they are unaware that the dates they have given the site was flooded by the solent!! So unless someone is suggesting that this einkorn was placed under in the sediment (next to the other carbon dated wood of the same date) by some UNKNOWN means - perhaps a prehistoric deep sea diver??..it's complete nonsense..LOL!! B-)ReplyDelete