Friday, 10 April 2026

North Devon Glacial Erratics: A Master Catalogue

sarsen.org — Megalithic Research

North Devon Glacial Erratics:
A Master Catalogue

All documented boulders from Madgett & Inglis (1987) with supplementary higher-level examples from Baggy Point

Compiled from published sources — 39 boulders total

The most definitive combined record available from the published literature is the Madgett & Inglis (1987) catalogue of 37 erratics — the only systematic, peer-reviewed table with grid references, dimensions, and lithologies — supplemented by two higher-level examples on Baggy Point documented by Paul Berry (2021 field observations) and Paul Madgett.

No later paper has published an updated numbered catalogue with precise altitudes for every boulder. The “suite of over twenty” sometimes quoted in popular accounts is a round-up of the 37 (mostly shoreline) plus the few higher examples. Altitudes for the 1987 set are not given individually in the paper except for No. 8 (Ramson Cliff, Baggy Point); the text states the vast majority lie on the foreshore, raised shore platforms, or in beach and raised-beach contexts, typically below 30 m OD.

Context Security — Column Guide Assessment of how reliably each boulder’s recorded position reflects original glacial emplacement. High = in situ on platform with minimal post-depositional movement; Medium = partly buried or subject to tidal influence; Low = ploughed or explicitly relocated by agricultural activity.
39Total documented
37Madgett & Inglis 1987
2Supplementary higher-level
<30mOD for most boulders
✦ ✦ ✦

Main Catalogue — Madgett & Inglis (1987), Nos. 1–37

Foreshore and raised-platform boulders; the majority below 30 m OD

No. Lithology Size (cm) Grid Ref. (SS) Altitude Discoverer / Date Context Security
1Pink/red foliated granite240 × 210 × 100+44013786<30 m (foreshore/gully)Williams 1837High — in situ, raised-beach context
2Granulite gneiss (‘50-tonner’)420 × 220 × 200+42794001<30 m (foreshore)Hughes 1887High — on planed platform
3Quartz porphyry150 × 135 × 100+43803793<30 m (foreshore)Hughes 1887High
4Foliated granite/gneiss (‘White Rabbit’)120 × 75 × 50+43123849<30 m (gully below HTM)Dewey 1910Medium — appears/disappears in shingle
5Grey spilite80 × 80 × 4543933787<30 m (foreshore)Taylor 1956High
6Dolerite29 × 13 × 542724005<30 m (foreshore/cave)Taylor 1956Medium — tidal movement
7Agglomerate75 × 60 × 4042724005<30 m (foreshore/cave)Taylor 1956Medium — tidal movement
8Epidiorite (Ramson Cliff, Baggy Point)105 × 55 × 3843564070~80–85 m ODMadgett & Madgett 1974Low — ploughed/moved; possible manuport (see note)
9Contorted gneiss100 × 90 × 90+43343813<30 m (foreshore)Keene 1986High
10Rhyolitic tuff84 × 56 × 3743563923<30 m (beach/stony clay)E.A.I. 5/81High — embedded in alluvial context
11Gneiss135 × 90 × 5243183847<30 mB.M. 4/82High
12Polymictic conglomerate35 × 25 × 2342754003<30 mP.M. 4/82High
13Tuff25 × 20 × 1242754003<30 mP.M. 4/82High
14Greenstone55 × 40 × 30+44423779<30 mE.A.I. 9/82High
15Granite25 × 16 × 943113846<30 mP.M. 4/83High
16Meta-dolerite30 × 19 × 1243113849<30 mP.M. 4/83High
17Foliated microgranite27 × 20 × 1443113849<30 mP.M. 4/83High
18Feldspar porphyry37 × 27 × 1943103836<30 mP.M. 4/83High
19Rhyolitic tuff40 × 23 × 2243103837<30 mP.M. 4/83High
20Tuff25 × 20 × 1543093838<30 mP.M. 4/83High
21Feldspar porphyry29 × 21 × 1443083836<30 mP.M. 4/83High
22Porphyritic microgranite125 × 95 × 60+44033786<30 mP.M. 4/83High
23Microdiorite33 × 17 × 643543925<30 mE.A.I. 6/83High
24Feldspar porphyry25 × 19 × 1443103850<30 mP.M. 7/83High
25Microgranite41 × 20 × 1543093852<30 mA.M. 7/83High
26Quartz conglomerate27 × 19 × 1143123837<30 mP.M. 7/83High
27Crystal tuff31 × 23 × 1543473920<30 mP.M. 7/83High
28Purple tuff32 × 29 × 1243433918<30 mP.M. 7/83High
29Granite76 × 69 × 4543473901<30 mE.A.I. 8/83High
30Brecciated granite30 × 23 × 2043473903<30 mE.A.I. 8/83High
31Rhyolite48 × 33 × 3243133847<30 mE.A.I. 5/84High
32Porphyritic rhyolite35 × 28 × 1843173822<30 mE.A.I. 5/84High
33Tuff40 × 25 × 2543423801<30 mA.M./B.M. 7/84High
34Amphibolite95 × 60 × 40+43683795<30 mP.M. 7/83High
35Brecciated lava65 × 31 × 25+44323782<30 mP.M. 8/85High
36Granite40 × 28 × 2543723794<30 mP.M. 12/85High
37Rhyolitic tuff25 × 18 × 1343103851<30 mP.M. 12/85High
✦ ✦ ✦

Supplementary Higher-Level Erratics — Baggy Point

Field observations by Berry (2021) and Madgett; above ~30 m OD with known relocation history

Note on No. 8 The Ramson Cliff epidiorite (No. 8 in the 1987 catalogue) is also located on Baggy Point at ~80–85 m OD and is the boulder Brian John refers to as the ‘80 m example’. It is listed separately in the main table above as a formally numbered catalogue entry. The two boulders below are the remaining supplementary high-level examples (Brian John’s ~45 m and ~60 m examples); they have no formal catalogue numbers.
No. Lithology Size Location Altitude Discoverer / Date Context Security
38 Tuff / agglomerate (south wall 1) Smaller; grey, square Higher path south of Croyde Hoe Farm ~60 m OD Late 1980s/1990s (ploughed) Low — ploughed from field, placed on stone wall
39 Tuff / agglomerate (south wall 2) Smaller; pinkish, irregular Same wall as No. 38 ~45–46 m OD Late 1980s/1990s (ploughed) Low — ploughed from field, placed on stone wall
✦ ✦ ✦

Key Notes on the Dataset

  • Total documented: 39 (37 from the only formal survey + No. 8 formally listed but at high altitude on Baggy Point + 2 supplementary wall boulders). There is no published evidence for 20 separate mid-level erratics.
  • Distribution: 36 boulders (Nos. 1–7, 9–37) are overwhelmingly shoreline or raised-platform in context, below 30 m OD. No. 8 (Ramson Cliff) is the sole formally catalogued high-altitude example, at ~80–85 m OD on Baggy Point.
  • The three Baggy Point high-level erratics (No. 8 and the two supplementary wall boulders) are small and angular rather than beach-rounded, and were disturbed by 1970s–1990s ploughing on former arable fields. Their context security is low for the purpose of proving ice reached those altitudes.
  • Context security of the shoreline cluster is generally high for depositional environment studies; the higher examples are real but their relocation history — and in the case of No. 8, the possibility that it is a manuport — means they cannot straightforwardly be used as ice-extent markers.
  • The negative claim that no further mid-level erratics exist reflects the published record only. Unpublished field notes or thin-section updates from Paul Madgett could yet expand the picture.

Sources

Nos. 1–37: Madgett, P.A. & Inglis, J.B. (1987). The erratics of the North Devon coast. [Systematic catalogue with grid references, dimensions and lithologies.]

Nos. 38–39: Berry, P. (2021). Field observations, coastal-walk records (photographs of 45 m and 60 m examples, Baggy Point); Madgett, P.A., correspondence quoted by Brian John.

sarsen.org — Tim Daw — Megalithic & Archaeological Research

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments welcome on fresh posts - you just need a Google account to do so.