Transport of the Stonehenge Bluestones: Testing the Glacial Hypothesis by JD SCOURSE · 1997 http://publications.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/pubs/proc/files/92p271.pdf highlights this:
In Hawley's 6th Report Jan 1926 Vol V1 No.1 The Antiquaries Journal which is of his 1924 excavations he describes finding a foreign stone and also a photo of the excavation.
I think the stone pictured in the middle of the very left hand side of the excavations around stone 8, judging by the scale, is about the right depth and size to be the foreign stone he mentions. This provides the original context for the stone. (Click to embiggen)
I gather this was not included in "The Field Guide to the Glacial Erratics of Salisbury Plain"?ReplyDelete
The field guide only included erratics recorded in their natural position, ones that have been transported by humans to their first recorded position, such as this one, don't tell us anything about glacial transport.Delete
This stone is questionably an artifact (modified by humans) but if not it is a manuport. In archaeology and anthropology, a manuport is a natural object which has been moved from its original context by human agency but otherwise remains unmodified. The word derives from the Latin words manus, meaning 'hand' and portare, meaning 'to carry'Delete