The Newall Boulder - Correcting the Record

The enigmatic ‘Newall boulder’ excavated at Stonehenge in 1924: new data and correcting the record

Richard E. Bevins, Nick J.G. Pearce, Rob A. Ixer, James Scourse, Tim Daw, Mike Parker Pearson, Mike Pitts, David Field, Duncan Pirrie, Ian Saunders, Matthew Power

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports,

Volume 66, 2025, 105303, ISSN 2352-409X,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105303

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25003360)

Abstract

This paper aims to clarify the record regarding previous studies on the Newall boulder and samples taken from it for analysis and to correct errors of fact introduced into the current literature. Petrographic, automated SEM-EDS analysis and portable XRF investigation (including new analyses) relating to the characteristics and composition of the Newall boulder are presented, supporting (a) the interpretation that its original source was Craig Rhos-y-Felin, in north Pembrokeshire and (b) that there is no evidence to support an interpretation that it is a glacial erratic. In addition, it is shown that the overall non-sarsen lithological assemblage at Stonehenge is restricted, supporting derivation by human activity from a limited number of sites, predominantly from west Wales, but also NE Scotland, and not derived from glacial erratics.   

Figure 6. Columns of foliated rhyolite at Craig Rhos-y-Felin, north Pembrokeshire. The strong foliation in the rhyolite is parallel to the large face to the right. The rounded tops of the columns are broadly “bullet shaped”, identical in form to the Newall boulder. A pair of small dots show the tapering of the column to the left (arrowed), giving it similar proportions at the base to the stump of Stonehenge Stone 32d and the top broadly similar to the Newall boulder, being about 10-15 cm across at the top, widening to about 45 cm at the base. 

Conclusions

Contrary to the opinion of Kellaway (1991) and John (2024a) we re-present data and our interpretation that the so-called ‘Newall boulder’, excavated at Stonehenge in 1924 by Lt-Col Hawley is not a glacial erratic. It is one of very few stones recovered from Stonehenge to which such an attribution has been made, which in itself challenges the hypothesis that the stones comprising the bluestone assemblage (and now also the Altar Stone) were transported to Salisbury Plain by ice, rather than the alternative view that they were transported to site by humans. Extensive field surveys across the Stonehenge Landscape and surrounding areas have failed to identify any glacial erratics; indeed, glacial deposits of any kind are also notably absent meaning that there is no evidence for ice extending as far south as Salisbury Plain.

A small number of bluestone fragments have been collected from sites a short distance away from the monument itself, including the Greater Cursus, Silbury Hill and Boles Barrow. However, these are almost exclusively small, angular pieces interpreted as debitage fragments, and it is most likely that they relate to human-effected dispersal.

Extensive examination of excavated material from historic and recent excavations at Stonehenge have shown the bluestone assemblage to be restricted in its lithological varieties, comprising no more than 15 different rock types, which is at odds with the 46 or so rock types proposed by John (2024a). The limited range of rock types argues strongly in favour of human selection (and hence transport) of the bluestone material.

The Newall boulder is identified as a joint block of foliated rhyolite originally sourced from Craig Rhos-y-Felin, in north Pembrokeshire (west Wales) and almost certainly represents a block broken off a monolith, most probably the now buried stump of Stone 32d. New mineralogical and geochemical data presented conforms to the data presented in Bevins (2023a), reinforcing the Craig Rhos-y-Felin source for the Newall boulder.

In summary, we reiterate our earlier interpretation that the Newall boulder is not a glacial erratic, that there is no evidence of glaciation on Salisbury Plain, and that the bluestones were transported to Stonehenge by humans rather than by ice.

GIS-Based Least-Cost Path Analysis in Eswatini’s Stone Age Archaeology

Bader et al. "Decoding hunter-gatherer-knowledge and selective choice of lithic raw materials during the Middle and Later Stone Age in Eswatini" (Journal of Archaeological Science 180, 2023, 106002) employs GIS-based least-cost path analysis to elucidate the mobility patterns of Middle and Later Stone Age hunter-gatherers in Eswatini, focusing on their strategic transport of lithic materials. By integrating terrain, slope, and resource distribution data, the analysis maps optimal routes between raw material outcrops, notably red jasper and green chalcedony and demonstrates that hunter-gatherers transported them over distances ranging from 20 to as much as 100 kilometers. The research clarifies that larger clasts (62–256 mm), ideal for knapping, were not effectively transported by fluvial processes. Instead, humans deliberately carried these clasts from primary outcrops.

An interesting use of the technique which will have more uses in the study of  Neolithic Wessex, I'm sure. As does the innate drive in prehistory to transport lithics. 

 Least cost path analysis indicating the optimal transport routes between raw material outcrops and archaeological sites.

Gregor D. Bader, Christian Sommer, Jörg Linstädter, Dineo P. Masia, Matthias A. Blessing, Bob Forrester, Brandi L. MacDonald,

Decoding hunter-gatherer-knowledge and selective choice of lithic raw materials during the Middle and Later Stone Age in Eswatini, Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 180, 2025, 106302, ISSN 0305-4403,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106302.

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325001517)

Abstract: Reconstructing past movement and mobility patterns requires a landscape-scale approach with knowledge of potential raw material sources and, ideally, multiple archaeological sites. Building on legacy collections in the Lobamba Museum in Eswatini and the identification of primary lithic raw material outcrops through landscape survey, we can provide scenarios of raw material provisioning for hunter-gatherers in Eswatini over the past 40 000 years. We used Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) to refine the terminology as the three ‘chert’ varieties from the archaeological sites Hlalakahle, Siphiso, Sibebe and Nkambeni are more precisely described as red jasper, green chalcedony and black chert. We were able to identify the primary outcrops for both red jasper and the green chalcedony. Using a least cost path (LCP) analysis together with hydrological and geomorphometric estimates of clast transport in relevant rivers, we reconstructed potential transportation routes of raw material and infer likely provisioning scenarios. During the final Middle Stone Age (MSA), red jasper occurs rarely or is absent in archaeological assemblages, while green chalcedony and other chert variants are frequently observed. This is despite the source of red jasper occurring near the green chalcedony outcrop. During the Later Stone Age (LSA), the red jasper, and a red chert variant of unknown provenance appear more frequently, indicating different raw material provisioning choices.

Natural Route Analysis of Possible Bluestone Routes.

Last year I linked to a pre-print of this paper - https://www.sarsen.org/2024/04/the-natural-corridor-for-bluestones.html - this is the revised and accepted paper.

Joseph Lewis, Estimating the scale-dependent influence of natural terrestrial corridors on the positioning of settlements: A multi-scale study of Roman forts in Wales,

Journal of Archaeological Science,Volume 170, 2024, 106055, ISSN 0305-4403,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2024.106055.

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440324001237)

Abstract: Natural terrestrial corridors have been shown to have influenced the positioning of past settlements. The scale at which this pattern-process relationship operates is often un-estimated and thus remains unclear. This paper proposes the comparison of multiple point process models as an approach for estimating the optimal scale at which this relationship is strongest... 

Fig. 4. Natural terrestrial corridors at process scale of 1,100m for the walking-only scenario

Natural route analysis gives us a powerful, terrain-based lens into how people might have moved across ancient landscapes. By modeling least-cost paths (LCPs) across digital elevation models (DEMs), this approach identifies natural terrestrial corridors, low-gradient paths along river valleys, ridges, and coastal plains, that minimize energy expenditure during travel. We can then hypothesis the most likely overland routes the Stonehenge bluestones could have followed from Preseli to Salisbury Plain. When these models align with known historic routes like Roman roads and drovers’ tracks, it suggests we’re seeing deep-rooted patterns of movement that span millennia. This research helps bridge digital modelling with human experience on the ground, offering a realistic, testable framework for where to look next for archaeological evidence. Importantly, such models gain significant credibility when grounded in real-world experience. Keith Ray’s practical testing of the route—through physically walking and evaluating terrain—offers a preliminary experiential dataset that enhances the digital model with lived landscape insight.

Cattle Traction and Neolithic Monument Building at Newgrange

An excellent new paper on Newgrange, one of Ireland’s most iconic Neolithic passage tombs, offers fresh perspectives on its social and technological context. Published in Antiquity, the study critically examines claims of a dynastic elite.

Reference:
Smyth, J., Carlin, N., Hofmann, D., Frieman, C. J., Bickle, P., Cleary, K., Greaney, S., & Pope, R. (2025). The ‘king’ of Newgrange? A critical analysis of a Neolithic petrous fragment from the passage tomb chamber. Antiquity, 99(405), 672 doi:10.15184/aqy.2025.63.

Cattle Traction: A Game-Changer for Neolithic Construction

Among the paper’s insights on incest, elites, and mortuary practices, a note about cattle traction stood out to me. The use of domesticated cattle to pull heavy loads, evidenced by mid-fourth millennium BC zooarchaeological data, challenges traditional views of Neolithic monument building. This technology suggests that the construction of massive passage tombs like Newgrange did not necessarily require a stratified society, offering a new lens on social organisation in prehistoric Ireland.

By enabling the efficient transport of massive stones and materials, cattle traction reduced the human labour required which suggests that smaller, community-based groups could have undertaken construction through cooperative, episodic efforts, aligning with heterarchical social models where power was distributed rather than centralised.

The ability to harness cattle traction highlights how technological innovation, rather than social stratification, could account for the scale and complexity of these monuments. This emphasises how collective action and decentralised resource management in Neolithic societies may be more important than elite control. But critics of the community-based model suggest that some archaeologists may be influenced by modern preferences for egalitarianism, potentially leading to "wishful thinking" that underestimates the possibility of social hierarchies in the Neolithic.

For a detailed exploration of cattle traction’s role in Neolithic Ireland, including zooarchaeological evidence and its implications for resource exploitation, see:

Pigière, F. & Smyth, J.. 2023. First evidence for cattle traction in Middle Neolithic Ireland: a pivotal element for resource exploitation. PLoS ONE 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279556

The Ox That Moved a Mountain: A Tooth’s Tale from Stonehenge

Imagine the scene: a line of Neolithic people and cattle, inching their way across the British landscape, the air thick with the effort of a communal task that would echo through millennia. At the centre of this spectacle is not just a stone—a bluestone, weighing as much as four tons—but also the animals that helped move it. Among them, perhaps, was one remarkable cow, whose story is written not in legend, but in the enamel of her tooth.

A Tooth as a Time Capsule

In 2025, archaeologists published a study of a Neolithic cattle tooth found in the ditch at Stonehenge. This was no ordinary tooth: it was the animal’s third molar (M3), which forms when a cow is about two years old—her physical prime. By slicing the tooth into nine thin layers and analyzing the isotopes within, researchers could reconstruct a six-month window of her life, tracking where she traveled, what she ate, and even moments of acute physical stress.

This tooth, though excavated from the jaw of an “elderly” animal, is a time capsule from her youth. The enamel grew as she reached maturity, capturing the chemical signals of her diet, her environment, and her body’s response to extraordinary events.

The Isotopic Roadmap

The tooth’s enamel is a chemical diary.
Strontium isotopes (⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr) revealed a journey from the radiogenic soils of Wales (with high strontium values) to the chalky downs of Wessex (lower strontium), echoing the very route the bluestones themselves are thought to have traveled.
Oxygen and carbon isotopes showed seasonal shifts, indicating movement between woodland and grassland, and reflecting changes in water sources and diet as the animal moved across varied landscapes.

These isotopic signatures are not just numbers—they are a record of movement and change, a chemical map of a journey that may have spanned hundreds of kilometers.

The Lead Spike: A Moment of Strain

But the most intriguing clue was a sharp, short-lived spike in lead (Pb) within the tooth. Scientists know that lead stored in bones can be released into the bloodstream during periods of intense stress—traditionally, this is linked to pregnancy and lactation in female animals. Yet, the spike in this cow’s tooth lasted only about a month, much shorter than a typical pregnancy or nursing period.

Here’s where our thought experiment takes a leap: What if this lead surge was the physiological fingerprint of a different kind of stress? Imagine this young cow, harnessed and straining alongside her herd, pulling a multi-ton bluestone across the countryside. The effort could have triggered acute skeletal stress—enough to release a pulse of lead from her bones into her bloodstream, and into her growing tooth enamel. The duration of the spike matches the kind of short, intense episode it might have taken to haul a stone over a particularly challenging stretch.

The Archaeological Backdrop

The timing fits. The tooth dates to between 3350 and 2920 BC, overlapping with the earliest construction phases of Stonehenge and the likely period of bluestone transport. Archaeologists have long debated how these massive stones were moved. While some suggest teams of people alone could have managed the feat, others point to the advantages of animal traction. Cattle, after all, were already being used for ploughing in parts of Neolithic Europe, and experimental reconstructions show that even relatively young animals can pull heavy loads when harnessed together.

The animal’s advanced age at death suggests she lived a long and possibly eventful life. But it is her youth—the six months captured in her M3 tooth—that may have witnessed her greatest challenge.

The Ritual Afterlife

The jawbone containing this tooth was not simply discarded. It was found at the bottom of Stonehenge’s ditch, possibly curated for decades before burial. This hints at ritual or social significance—perhaps the animal was remembered as a participant in a legendary communal effort, her remains kept as a token of memory or gratitude.

The Science and Its Limits

Of course, this is a hypothesis—a story built on a blend of hard science and imagination. The lead spike could still be from reproductive stress, and female cows aren’t the classic draught animals (those are usually oxen—castrated males). Yet in a world where every hand, hoof, and horn counted, perhaps even a young cow could be called upon to help move mountains.

And while the isotopic evidence fits the story, it is not definitive. The strontium and oxygen signatures could also be explained by seasonal migration or foddering practices. The lead spike could be from an injury, an illness, or a metabolic event unrelated to work. With only a single tooth, we cannot see harness marks or bone injuries that might clinch the case for draught use.

Moreover, the science of lead mobilization is complex. Bone lead is released during any period of high bone turnover—be it from calving, injury, or exertion. The duration and intensity of the spike in this tooth is consistent with an acute episode, but we cannot say for certain what caused it.

The Broader Picture

Still, the scenario is plausible. The monumental task of moving bluestones would have benefited from animal traction, and the chemical signals in this tooth are consistent with a journey from Wales to Stonehenge and a period of intense physical stress. The animal’s life, as recorded in her tooth, mirrors the epic journey of the stones themselves.

A Tooth’s Legacy

This single tooth, then, is more than a fossil. It’s a time capsule, a witness to the sweat and struggle behind one of humanity’s greatest monuments. Whether or not this cow truly pulled a bluestone, her story—written in the language of isotopes—reminds us that the past is full of possibilities, waiting to be read in the smallest of details.

The Final Word: Science, Story, and Speculation

Ultimately, this narrative is a thought experiment—a way to bring the science to life and to honour the animals whose silent labour shaped the world we inherited. The true story of this cow may never be fully known, but her tooth gives us a tantalizing glimpse into the lives that shaped prehistory, and invites us to imagine the drama, the effort, and the ingenuity that built Stonehenge, one stone—and perhaps one ox—at a time.

Author’s Note:
This narrative is inspired by the findings of Evans et al. (2025) and current archaeological debates. While the scenario described here is plausible, it remains speculative. The real power of this story is in how science and imagination together can illuminate the hidden lives of the past.

Neolithic Cattle Mobility at Stonehenge: A Matrix of Possibilities

A recent study (Evans et al., 2025) analyses a Neolithic cattle molar (M3, 3350–2920 BC) from Stonehenge, revealing insights into husbandry through sequential multi-isotope sampling. The research maps diet, mobility, and reproductive stress over six months, presenting a matrix of possibilities for the cow’s seasonal movements and foddering practises, highlighting Neolithic agricultural complexity and regional connectivity.

Methods

The study divided the tooth into nine enamel slices (winter, slice 1, to summer, slice 9), analysing strontium (⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr) and lead (²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb, ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb, ²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁶Pb) isotopes for geographical origins, carbon (δ¹³C) and oxygen (δ¹⁸O) for diet and seasonality, and peptides (AMELX/AMELY) for sex (result: female). Clean-room techniques ensured data reliability. Lead isotopes, novel in Neolithic fauna, detected metabolic stress, possibly calving, advancing isotopic archaeology.

Comparison with Other Studies

Previous isotopic studies, e.g., Madgwick et al. (2019), linked Durrington Walls cattle to Wales or South-West England using strontium and oxygen isotopes, lacking temporal detail. Snoeck et al. (2018) tied Stonehenge’s human remains to Wales, suggesting regional networks. Evans et al. (2025) enhance this with sequential multi-isotope analysis, offering finer resolution, and introduce lead isotopes for physiological insights, building on human studies (Gulson et al., 1998) and multi-proxy approaches (Bentley, 2006).

Matrix of Possibilities

Isotopic patterns—high strontium (~0.7144) and lower δ¹³C (woodland diet) in winter, low strontium (<0.7110) and higher δ¹³C (grassland grazing) in summer—yield two main models: migration or static foddering, with a bone transport third possibility. Lead spikes (e.g., ²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁶Pb = 2.104, slice 4) suggest metabolic stress, possibly calving. The table outlines the matrix.

Model	Winter (High Sr, Lower δ13C)	Summer (Low Sr, Higher δ13C)	Origin	Likelihood
1A. Migration	Wales Woodland	Wessex Grassland	Wales	High
1B. Migration	South-West England Woodland	Wessex Grassland	South-West	Medium
2A. Static	Welsh Woodland Hay (in Wessex)	Wessex Grassland	Wales	Medium
2B. Static	South-West Woodland Hay (in Wessex)	Wessex Grassland	South-West	Medium
2C. Static	Non-Local Hay (Wales/South-West)	Wessex Grassland	Wessex	Low-Medium
3A. Bone Transport	Wales Woodland	Wales Grassland (Low Sr Area)	Wales	Low

Discussion of Results and Likelihoods

The matrix reveals sophisticated Neolithic husbandry. Model 1A (migration: Welsh woodlands to Wessex grasslands) and 2A (static: Welsh-born, Wessex-fed with Welsh hay) are most likely, supported by lead isotopes consistent with Welsh ores, though not definitive due to skeletal remobilization (Müller et al., 2019). These align with Stonehenge’s Welsh links, e.g., Preseli bluestones (Parker Pearson et al., 2022). 1B and 2B (South-West England) are less probable, as lead favours Wales. 2C (Wessex-born, non-local hay) requires extensive fodder transport, less supported archaeologically (Halstead, 1998). 3A (bone transport: Wales grazing, bones to Wessex) is unlikely, as summer low strontium (<0.7110) and dietary lead (more likely from English ores rather than Welsh ones, unlike the Skeletal Pb) suggest Wessex residence, not a Welsh low-strontium area (Evans et al., 2022). Curation (55–270 years pre-deposition) allows bone transport, but isotopic data favour live cattle in Wessex (Serjeantson, 1995). Lead spikes indicate metabolic stress, possibly calving, suggesting managed breeding.

Limitations

The study’s reliance on a single tooth limits generalisability. Lead isotope interpretations, influenced by skeletal remobilization, are not definitive for origin or pregnancy, which is inferred from stress rather than direct evidence. Further samples are needed to refine the matrix.

References

• Balasse, M., Boury, L., Ughetto-Monfrin, J. and Tresset, A., 2012. Stable isotope evidence for seasonal consumption of plants by herbivores: a case study in north-western Europe. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 4(4), pp.299–311. doi:10.1179/1461410312Z.0000000003.
• Bentley, R.A., 2006. Strontium isotopes from the earth to the archaeological skeleton: a review. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(3), pp.135–187. doi:10.1007/s10816-006-9009-x.
• Cerling, T.E. and Harris, J.M., 1999. Carbon isotope fractionation between diet and bioapatite in ungulate mammals and implications for ecological and paleoecological studies. Oecologia, 120(3), pp.347–363. doi:10.1007/s004420050868.
• Evans, J.A., Mee, K., Chenery, C.A. and Marchant, A.P., 2022. Biosphere isotope domains GB (V2): interactive website. British Geological Survey. Available at: https://www.bgs.ac.uk/datasets/biosphere-isotope-domains-gb/ [Accessed 22 June 2025].
• Evans, J., Madgwick, R., Pashley, V., Wagner, D., Savickaite, K., Buckley, M. and Parker Pearson, M., 2025. Sequential multi-isotope sampling through a Bos taurus tooth from Stonehenge, to assess comparative sources and incorporation times of strontium and lead. Journal of Archaeological Science, 180, p.106269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106269.
• Gulson, B.L., Jameson, C.W. and Gillings, B.R., 1998. Lead isotopes in teeth as indicators of lead exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106(2), pp.75–80.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9304823/.
• Halstead, P., 1998. Ask the fellows who lop the hay: leaf-fodder in the mountains of northwest Greece. Rural History, 9(2), pp.211–234. doi:10.1017/S0956793300001588.
• Kohn, M.J., 2010. Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C3 plants as indicators of (paleo)ecology and (paleo)climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(46), pp.19691–19695. doi:10.1073/pnas.1004933107.
• Liesegang, A., Risteli, J. and Wanner, M., 2006. Bone metabolism in dairy cows: a longitudinal study. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(8), pp.3036–3044. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.006.
• Madgwick, R., Lamb, A.L., Sloane, H., Nederbragt, A.J., Albarella, U., Parker Pearson, M. and Evans, J.A., 2019. Strontium and oxygen isotope evidence for the origins of cattle at Durrington Walls. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(8), pp.4311–4324. doi:10.1007/s12520-019-00849-w.
• Montgomery, J., 2002. Lead and strontium isotope compositions of human dental tissues as an indicator of ancient exposure and population dynamics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bradford.
• Montgomery, J., Evans, J.A. and Horstwood, M.S.A., 2010. Lead isotopes in archaeology: a review. Archaeometry, 52(4), pp.653–676. doi:10.1179/146141010X12640787648694.
• Müller, W., Fricke, H., Halliday, A.N., McCulloch, M.T. and Wartho, J.A., 2019. Enamel mineralization and lead incorporation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 252, pp.104–123. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2019.03.005.
• O’Leary, M.H., 1988. Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. BioScience, 38(5), pp.328–336. doi:10.2307/1310735.
• Parker Pearson, M, Pollard, J, Richards, C, Thomas, J, Tilley, C & Welham, K 2022, Stonehenge for the ancestors Part 2: Synthesis. vol. 2, Sidestone Press, Leiden , Leiden. https://www.sidestone.com/books/stonehenge-for-the-ancestors-part-2.
• Snoeck, C., Pouncett, J., Claeys, P., Goderis, S., Mattielli, N., Parker Pearson, M., Willis, C., Zazzo, A., Lee-Thorp, J.A. and Schulting, R.J., 2018. Strontium isotope analysis on cremated human remains from Stonehenge. Scientific Reports, 8, p.10790. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28969-8.
• Spencer, H., 1979. Lead in bone and teeth. Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology, 2(5), pp.987–1000.
• van der Merwe, N.J. and Medina, E., 1991. The canopy effect, carbon isotope ratios and foodwebs in Amazonia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 18(3), pp.249–259. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(91)90064-V.

BBC fact checking the solstice alignment

 BBC Bitesize on "summer solstice myths and the truth behind them"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zyd3wsg

That Stonehenge was built to align to the Solstices is one of the very few certainties about it.

To downgrade this to a being just a claim by English Heritage and on par with myths about Merlin and Aliens is insulting. That was also a "burial ground" is an additional fact not an alternative one.