Friday 29 June 2018

The A40 Bluestone Transport Route to Stonehenge

The Times  (29/7/18) picks up on the Bevins and Ixer paper below to tie in the Altar Stone to the A40 route of bluestone transport.

Stonehenge hauliers carved a route from Welsh borders

At the heart of Stonehenge lies a six-tonne riddle. The Altar Stone is formed from a purplish-green sandstone that is unlike anything else on the site.

Archaeologists believe the stone was hauled to Salisbury Plain from the Welsh borders by crossing up to three rivers. It raises the possibility of a Stone Age highway for megaliths stretching from Pembrokeshire to Wiltshire.

The larger sarsens come from nearby Marlborough Downs and the smaller bluestones from the Preseli mountains in Pembrokeshire, but the sandstone of the Altar Stone is foreign to both areas.

Rob Ixer, of the University of Leicester, and Richard Bevins, of the National Museum of Wales, say it was “very probably” quarried from the Senni Beds, a formation of sandstone from Llanelli to Herefordshire.

Getting it to Stonehenge would have involved hauling it down to Monmouth and the lower reaches of the River Wye with oxen and skids or rollers; then negotiating the River Severn, either near Gloucester and going south to Wiltshire, or taking a raft down the river and across to the mouth of the Avon.

Dr Ixer and Dr Bevins’s idea could overturn the established theory of how the bluestones found their way from west Wales. It suggests that the bluestones may have been carried not by water, as the geologist Herbert Henry Thomas thought a century ago, but by land. In the journal Antiquity, Dr Ixer and Dr Bevins say Thomas’s sourcing of the bluestones and Altar Stone, the basis of a sea route east towards Stonehenge, was based on “sloppy” work.

As previously reported: “The only logical direction for the bluestones to go was to the north then either by sea around St David’s Head or eastwards overland through the valleys along the route that is now the A40” said Professor Parker Pearson. “Personally I think that the overland route is more likely. Each of the 80 monoliths weighed less than 2 tons, so teams of people or oxen could have managed this. We know from examples in India and elsewhere in Asia that single stones this size can even be carried on wooden lattices by groups of 60 – they didn’t even have to drag them if they didn’t want to.”

The Paper:

Retracing the footsteps of H.H. Thomas: a review of his Stonehenge bluestone provenancing study

Richard Bevins and Rob Ixer

Published online: 31 May 2018


The long-distance transport of the Stonehenge bluestones from the Mynydd Preseli area of north Pembrokeshire was first proposed by geologist H.H. Thomas in 1923. For over 80 years, his work on the provenancing of the Stonehenge bluestones from locations in Mynydd Preseli in south Wales has been accepted at face value. New analytical techniques, alongside transmitted and reflected light microscopy, have recently prompted renewed scrutiny of Thomas's work. While respectable for its time, the results of these new analyses, combined with a thorough checking of the archived samples consulted by Thomas, reveal that key locations long believed to be sources for the Stonehenge bluestones can be discounted in favour of newly identified locations at Craig-Rhos-y-felin and Carn Goedog.

Source: click to enlarge.

Bevins, R., & Ixer, R. (2018). Retracing the footsteps of H.H. Thomas: A review of his Stonehenge bluestone provenancing study. Antiquity, 1-15. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.10

1 comment:

  1. So why has the map shown two entirely different routes, one shown with a dotted line, labelled "possible land route", avoiding that difficult crossing of the Bristol Channel, while there's another shown with a solid red line labelled "new theory"? Surely it's old superceded theory if the solid red line route from Hay-on-Wye is correct? (Why Hay-on-Wye incidentally?).

    What we see is UK mass-media journalism at its brain-dead worst- whether the Mail (see my comment on an earlier post) or the redoubtable Times.

    Why is the solid red line route labelled "new theory"if we're now supposed to think it was the dotted line route avoiding the Bristol Channel?

    Britain's mass media is no longer fit for purpose (and hasn't been for some 20-30 years if the truth be told)