Thursday, 18 December 2025

Stonehenge Clockface Solstitial Alignments

 

Modified Stonehenge Plan based on Stonehenge Plan by Anthony Johnson, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

Stonehenge encodes both winter solstice sunrise and winter solstice sunset in its architecture. The primary axis aligns to midwinter sunset (and midsummer sunrise), while the deliberately skewed central trilithon (stones 55–56 with lintel 156) and Altar Stone align to midwinter sunrise (and midsummer sunset).

The Clockface Model

Imagine the completed outer sarsen circle divided into sixty equal parts, thirty stones and thirty gaps, exactly like the minute marks on a clockface.

Place the main solstitial axis vertically: midsummer sunrise at 12 o’clock, midwinter sunset at 6 o’clock.

At Stonehenge’s latitude (≈51° N) in c. 2500 BCE, the direction to midwinter sunrise was offset from the main axis by approximately 81°.

On the same sixty-point clockface, draw a straight chord from the 15-minute mark to the 42-minute mark. This chord, and other parallel ones, form an angle of exactly 81° with the vertical diameter. The great central trilithon and Altar Stone were oriented along precisely this chord, thereby also aligning the monument to midwinter sunrise in one direction and midsummer sunset in the opposite direction.

By treating the outer sarsen circle as a sixty-point clockface, the builders embedded both winter solstice directions into the monument using only simple straight lines (chords).

Midwinter sunset lies along the vertical 12–6 axis; midwinter sunrise lies along the 15-to-42-minute chord at 81° to it.

Tuesday, 16 December 2025

The Absent Dead of Stonehenge

The enduring puzzle of Early Neolithic mortuary practices in southern Britain—why so few human remains survive relative to expected population sizes—has long been attributed to taphonomic loss, poor preservation, or incomplete excavation coverage. Katharine Ward’s groundbreaking work decisively reframes this issue, demonstrating empirically that the scarcity reflects deliberate cultural selection rather than accidental absence.


In her 2022 Master’s thesis (A Holistic Approach to Understanding Mortuary Practices in Early Neolithic Southern Britain, University of Birmingham) and its refined 2025 publication (Evidence of Absence: A Case Study of Early Neolithic Human Remains Near Stonehenge World Heritage Site, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, first published 8 December 2025), Ward compiles a comprehensive dataset of all known Early Neolithic human remains in Wiltshire (minimum number of individuals, MNI = 298 across four centuries). The overwhelming majority derive from monumental contexts: long mounds (152), chambered tombs (128), with only minor contributions from causewayed enclosures (9) and pits (9).

The assemblages are predominantly disarticulated, fragmentary, and commingled, indicating complex multi-stage rites involving defleshing, circulation of elements, and selective redeposition. Demographically, prime-age adults dominate, while sub-adults and mature adults are markedly under-represented.

To test whether this pattern results from investigative bias, Ward conducts a rigorous presence–absence analysis in two intensively surveyed areas: the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and the Salisbury region. Despite decades of large-scale developer-funded archaeology, non-monumental Early Neolithic features and human remains remain vanishingly rare outside known monuments. This, Ward argues, confirms the genuineness of the absence: monumental deposition was a privileged, exclusive rite afforded only to a curated minority, while the majority—the ‘absent dead’—underwent practices (e.g., excarnation or cremation with dispersal) that left no durable trace.

Ward’s methodology—systematically contrasting recovered evidence against the extent of modern investigative coverage—offers a replicable framework for other regions. Her findings align with recent aDNA studies indicating tightly controlled kin-based access to chambered tombs, reinforcing the interpretation of deliberate social differentiation

By shifting focus from presumed loss to demonstrated selection, she compels us to view surviving remains not as depleted samples but as evidence of ideological and social exclusivity. This illuminates concepts of ancestry, personhood, and memory in the Early Neolithic while highlighting the diverse, often invisible, rites applied to most of the population. 

WARD, K. (2022): A Holistic Approach to Understanding Mortuary Practices in Early Neolithic Southern Britain (Masters thesis, University of Birmingham).

Ward, K. (2025). Evidence of absence: a case study of early Neolithic human remains near Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. doi:10.1111/ojoa.70009.  Also on researchgate.

Sunday, 14 December 2025

I Object To The Flashing Tip of the Council's Stonehenge Erection

Really? Wiltshire Council lavished public funds on the Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Setting Study, which provides the background to the Core Policy 59 of the Wiltshire Core Strategy, adopted with such pomp in October 2025 to shield the site's Outstanding Universal Value from the scourge of all intrusion and they now submit their own application (PL/2025/06175) for a 24-metre (blade tip) wind turbine at High Post Salt Store. Where, one wonders, is the viewpoint study, the photomontages, or any hint that the authors have actually perused their own guidance? The mood on Bluesky seems to be that merely "the flashing tip of the erection" will peek through the trees. I would prefer my view from the monument without that.


The elevation plan of the view from Stonehenge, from eye level, to the proposed Wind Turbine shown to vertical scale. Click to enlarge .
My own amateur work as the planning documentation failed to include one.

The elevation plan from Woodhenge is even worse.



The Setting of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), adopted by Wiltshire Council in October 2025, addresses tall or high structures (explicitly exemplified as pylons, wind turbines, radio masts, industrial and incinerator chimneys) with particular stringency due to their potential to harm the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the World Heritage Site (WHS) through changes to its setting.

Key Provisions on Tall Structures

  • County-wide screening requirement — Unlike most other development types, which trigger screening for Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) only within specific distances (e.g., 1–5 km) or on sensitive features (e.g., ridgelines or astronomical alignments), tall structures require screening for all planning applications anywhere in Wiltshire. This reflects their potential for long-distance visual impact.
  • Rationale for broad application — The SPD notes that "tall structures and other major development could affect the setting of the WHS even when sited on land that is not itself visible from the WHS" (page 9). Height allows them to intrude into views, skylines, or the broader landscape context experienced from the WHS or its key monuments, even from considerable distances.
  • Application to neighbouring areas — While the SPD formally covers Wiltshire, it highlights that large-scale or very tall proposals in adjacent authorities (e.g., Swindon Borough, Test Valley, Hampshire) also have "some potential to affect the setting and hence OUV of the WHS" (page 9), implying consultation or consideration where relevant.

Implications for Structures Near the WHS

For tall/high structures proposed near the WHS (e.g., within the visual envelope, on elevated land, or along key sightlines), the impacts would be subject to even closer scrutiny through the HIA process outlined in Section 3.0. The SPD's detailed descriptions of setting (Part 2, Chapters 4 and 5) emphasise protecting views, visibility, relationships between monuments, and the open, largely undeveloped character of the landscape. Intrusive vertical elements that disrupt skylines or distant backdrops would likely be assessed as harmful to OUV attributes.

In summary, the SPD does not impose an outright ban but establishes a robust assessment framework. Tall/high structures face presumptive sensitivity across the county (and potentially beyond), with a clear intent to safeguard the WHS from visual harm. Developers should undertake early screening and, if required, a proportionate HIA informed by the SPD's methodology and setting descriptions.


A further objection letter:

Subject: Objection – Energy Efficiency and Suitability of Proposed 11kW Wind Turbine at High Post Salt Store

I am writing in relation to the planning application proposing the installation of an 11kW wind turbine intended to offset energy usage at the High Post Salt Store, which supports Wiltshire Council’s road gritting operations. I wish to object to this proposal on the grounds of energy efficiency and operational suitability, based on analysis of both the site’s energy profile and local weather data.


1. Energy Demand Profile

A salt storage and gritting facility of this size (approximately 500–1,000m², no scaled plan is provided) typically exhibits low baseline electrical consumption—estimated at 20,000–50,000kWh/year for activities such as lighting, ventilation, and machinery. However, it experiences significant peaks during winter operations, when 100–500kWh per operational night may be used for extended lighting, dehumidification, and loading. These peaks occur during the coldest nighttime periods—frequently under high-pressure systems with very low wind speeds.


2. Turbine Output and Intermittency

The proposed 11kW turbine, installed at 18m hub height in Wiltshire’s moderate wind regime, would have an expected annual yield of 7,000–14,000kWh/year, corresponding to a capacity factor of 7–15%. However, energy generation falls to zero or near zero below the 3–4m/s cut-in speed, meaning the turbine will produce minimal power on calm, freezing nights when demand is at its highest.

UK climatic patterns, particularly in southern Wiltshire, show an inverse relationship between low temperatures and wind strength—cold high-pressure systems bring calm weather, while stronger winds accompany milder, low-pressure conditions. Consequently, the turbine is unlikely to provide meaningful output during critical winter gritting operations, making on-site generation unreliable and necessitating continued grid backup.


3. Empirical Site-Specific Analysis

To assess this mismatch, I analysed local conditions using Boscombe Down weather data (Met Office station ID03746, located ~1.2miles from the site) for 8–14December2025. This period included a representative cold spell.

Temperature observations:

  • Range: 1°C–14°C (lowest values late12to early14December).
  • “Near-freezing” hours (≤5°C): 35hours, mostly overnight.

Wind data (converted fromkm/h tom/s):

  • Average for full 168-hour period: ~6m/s (22km/h).
  • Average during freezing hours: ~2.5–3m/s (mostly below cut-in).

Using the turbine’s power curve:

Wind speed (m/s)

Output (kW)

<3

0.0

4

1.1

5

2.8

6

5.0

7

7.3

8

8.9

9

10.4

10

11.4 (max)

 

Energy calculations:

  • Overall week: Avg. output5–6kW → 900–1,000kWh total energy (typical for a breezy period).
  • Cold hours (≤5°C): Avg. output0.5–1kW → 20–35kWh total.

The turbine would have produced most of its energy during milder, windier periods (e.g.9December and14December afternoon), but virtually none during the actual cold spell when gritting demand would peak.


4. Suitability and Policy Context

This performance profile demonstrates that the proposed turbine is unsuitable for reliably offsetting on-site energy use during operationally critical cold weather. The mismatch between supply and demand undermines its stated purpose and may provide limited practical decarbonisation benefit for the facility.

Wiltshire Council’s Climate Strategy Delivery Plan supports achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 through off-site renewables and green energy procurement, rather than requiring direct on-site matching. Relocating the turbine to a more exposed council-owned site or contributing to a community renewable scheme would yield the same annual offsetting (7,000–14,000kWh/year) via grid export, in line with national onshore wind strategy, while avoiding visual and environmental sensitivities at High Post.


5. Requested Action

Before determining this application, I request that the applicant be required to:

  1. Submit a detailed analysis using local historical data from BoscombeDown station (03746) to substantiate the turbine’s output during freezing conditions.
  2. Demonstrate operational compatibility with the salt store’s demand profile, including peak winter nights.
  3. Consider alternative offsetting approaches, including the redeployment of the turbine to a more wind-productive site or participation in community-scale generation.


In conclusion, while the goal of renewable energy offsetting is commendable, the proposed on-site turbine at High Post is technically inefficient for the intended operational need. A strategy based on off-site renewable contribution would achieve equal or greater environmental benefit with improved reliability and policy alignment.


 

Appendix: Temperature and windspeed data from: https://meteostat.net/en/station/03746?t=2025-12-08/2025-12-14

Turbine performance calculated from supplied data sheet

time

temp

wspd km/h

wspd m/s

Approx. Power (kW)

2025-12-08 00:00:00

8

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-08 01:00:00

9

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-08 02:00:00

10

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-08 03:00:00

11

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 04:00:00

11

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-08 05:00:00

11

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-08 06:00:00

11

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 07:00:00

12

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-08 08:00:00

11

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-08 09:00:00

12

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 10:00:00

12

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-08 11:00:00

13

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-08 12:00:00

13

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 13:00:00

12

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-08 14:00:00

12

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 15:00:00

12

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-08 16:00:00

12

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-08 17:00:00

12

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-08 18:00:00

12

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-08 19:00:00

12

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 20:00:00

11

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-08 21:00:00

12

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-08 22:00:00

12

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-08 23:00:00

12

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-09 00:00:00

12

26

7.22

2.26

2025-12-09 01:00:00

12

32

8.89

4.37

2025-12-09 02:00:00

11

33

9.17

4.81

2025-12-09 03:00:00

11

41

11.39

9.38

2025-12-09 04:00:00

11

41

11.39

9.38

2025-12-09 05:00:00

11

41

11.39

9.38

2025-12-09 06:00:00

11

37

10.28

6.85

2025-12-09 07:00:00

11

33

9.17

4.81

2025-12-09 08:00:00

12

37

10.28

6.85

2025-12-09 09:00:00

12

26

7.22

2.26

2025-12-09 10:00:00

13

35

9.72

5.77

2025-12-09 11:00:00

13

35

9.72

5.77

2025-12-09 12:00:00

13

33

9.17

4.81

2025-12-09 13:00:00

13

35

9.72

5.77

2025-12-09 14:00:00

13

43

11.94

10.85

2025-12-09 15:00:00

13

39

10.83

8.05

2025-12-09 16:00:00

14

35

9.72

5.77

2025-12-09 17:00:00

12

32

8.89

4.37

2025-12-09 18:00:00

12

30

8.33

3.57

2025-12-09 19:00:00

11

30

8.33

3.57

2025-12-09 20:00:00

11

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-09 21:00:00

10

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-09 22:00:00

10

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-09 23:00:00

9

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-10 00:00:00

8

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-10 01:00:00

9

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-10 02:00:00

10

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-10 03:00:00

9

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-10 04:00:00

9

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-10 05:00:00

9

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-10 06:00:00

9

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-10 07:00:00

10

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-10 08:00:00

10

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-10 09:00:00

11

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-10 10:00:00

11

24

6.67

1.74

2025-12-10 11:00:00

12

24

6.67

1.74

2025-12-10 12:00:00

12

26

7.22

2.26

2025-12-10 13:00:00

12

30

8.33

3.57

2025-12-10 14:00:00

12

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-10 15:00:00

11

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-10 16:00:00

9

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-10 17:00:00

9

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-10 18:00:00

6

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-10 19:00:00

6

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-10 20:00:00

6

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-10 21:00:00

5

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-10 22:00:00

5

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-10 23:00:00

5

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-11 00:00:00

6

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-11 01:00:00

5

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-11 02:00:00

6

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-11 03:00:00

6

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-11 04:00:00

6

4

1.11

0.00

2025-12-11 05:00:00

7

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-11 06:00:00

7

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-11 07:00:00

7

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-11 08:00:00

8

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-11 09:00:00

9

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-11 10:00:00

10

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-11 11:00:00

11

26

7.22

2.26

2025-12-11 12:00:00

11

26

7.22

2.26

2025-12-11 13:00:00

10

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-11 14:00:00

10

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-11 15:00:00

10

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-11 16:00:00

9

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-11 17:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-11 18:00:00

9

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-11 19:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-11 20:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-11 21:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-11 22:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-11 23:00:00

10

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 00:00:00

10

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-12 01:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-12 02:00:00

10

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-12 03:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-12 04:00:00

10

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-12 05:00:00

10

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-12 06:00:00

10

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 07:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-12 08:00:00

10

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-12 09:00:00

11

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 10:00:00

11

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 11:00:00

10

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 12:00:00

9

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 13:00:00

9

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 14:00:00

9

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-12 15:00:00

8

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-12 16:00:00

7

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-12 17:00:00

6

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-12 18:00:00

6

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-12 19:00:00

5

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-12 20:00:00

5

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-12 21:00:00

5

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-12 22:00:00

5

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-12 23:00:00

5

4

1.11

0.00

2025-12-13 00:00:00

5

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-13 01:00:00

4

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-13 02:00:00

4

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-13 03:00:00

3

2

0.56

0.00

2025-12-13 04:00:00

3

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-13 05:00:00

3

4

1.11

0.00

2025-12-13 06:00:00

2

4

1.11

0.00

2025-12-13 07:00:00

2

4

1.11

0.00

2025-12-13 08:00:00

1

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-13 09:00:00

1

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-13 10:00:00

4

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-13 11:00:00

6

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-13 12:00:00

8

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-13 13:00:00

9

13

3.61

0.13

2025-12-13 14:00:00

10

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-13 15:00:00

9

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-13 16:00:00

7

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-13 17:00:00

7

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-13 18:00:00

6

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-13 19:00:00

5

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-13 20:00:00

5

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-13 21:00:00

5

17

4.72

0.51

2025-12-13 22:00:00

6

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-13 23:00:00

5

9

2.50

0.00

2025-12-14 00:00:00

4

7

1.94

0.00

2025-12-14 01:00:00

5

15

4.17

0.29

2025-12-14 02:00:00

4

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-14 03:00:00

6

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-14 04:00:00

5

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-14 05:00:00

5

11

3.06

0.01

2025-12-14 06:00:00

5

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-14 07:00:00

6

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-14 08:00:00

6

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-14 09:00:00

7

6

1.67

0.00

2025-12-14 10:00:00

9

20

5.56

0.93

2025-12-14 11:00:00

10

24

6.67

1.74

2025-12-14 12:00:00

11

30

8.33

3.57

2025-12-14 13:00:00

10

30

8.33

3.57

2025-12-14 14:00:00

10

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-14 15:00:00

10

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-14 16:00:00

10

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-14 17:00:00

10

19

5.28

0.78

2025-12-14 18:00:00

10

22

6.11

1.30

2025-12-14 19:00:00

10

24

6.67

1.74

2025-12-14 20:00:00

11

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-14 21:00:00

11

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-14 22:00:00

11

28

7.78

2.87

2025-12-14 23:00:00

11

26

7.22

2.26