Sunday, 11 January 2026

The Brian John Boulder again

Photo: Dr Brian John

 We must thank Brian John for bringing this clast from Craig Rhos-y-felin to our attention:

In the words of 11 glacial geomorphologist:

1. If I had been doing a Reichelt shape classification I would have classed this as sub angular and typical of igneous clasts that have been dragged along the glacier bed.

2. I would say it has been glacially transported. That could account for the relatively smooth (abraded) surface and the other sub-angular surface and edges. There could even be some grooves on the abraded surface (upper image).

3. I would not be surprised if it is glacially transported. It looks to be the result of physical processes rather than chemkcal weathering. The light parts look hard and fresh and one side is flat. Corners and edges are neither sharp nor rounded. I could have picked it from a till in Bergen.

4. I am a bit less convinced. Looking at the right side of the first image the facets might be where cooling joints meet. That end is almost hexagonal. It is quite bullet-shaped though.

5. I would agree with my esteemed colleagues and say that there is certainly evidence for a possible faceted surface but difficult to say much more based on the photos.

6. In addition to the facets and chip marks that jumped out at first glance, the lower image to me has a slight bullet shape to it. Nothing definite from photos alone, and perhaps especially not from these two angles, but my very careful guess would agree with a subglacial transport path. Striae rarely preserve well (and on many lithologies don’t even form). Having said that, the clasts seem pretty weathered and battered.

7. Although quite hard to get a complete picture from just these two images, I’d say they seem to show a subrounded cobble/small boulder that is faceted, and has a shape that some people might say approaches a bullet-shape. I can also see some – what look like - chipmarks on some of its edges, the arrangement of which could indicate a responsible force from a single direction. From behind my wall of disclaimers and from within my cloud of speculation, I would probably guess that this boulder was subglacially transported. Striations on the faces would perhaps clinch it for me, but I could not see those in the images.

8. It's not possible to be definitive on the basis of these pictures alone. However, the presence of planar facets is consistent with subglacial transport. It would help if there were additional characters that might corroborate this, such as a stops-lee or double stoss-lee form. I guess there are no striations, or you would have mentioned them. Also rhyolite doesn't tend to striate.

9. My guess would be glacial. Not overly far travelled I’d say, but there does appear to be edge rounding and also chipping, with potential flat-iron faces. Looks like a lot of igneous clasts in tills in the north of Ireland.

10. I agree that this could be interpreted as subglacially transported boulder. Some rounding of the corners, but the facetted surface is not the best I have seen…if it has striations I would of course be 100% convinced.

11. Looks like a fluvioglacial clast. Definitely been in a fluvial system but only for short time as the degree of rounding is limited. The pic maybe misleading but I can see parallel lines -? Striations.

12. It looks partially faceted, edge rounded and abraded. The surfaces even appear to have some crude chattermarks/flip-outs. I cannot see any definitive striations but the lower image has an interesting set of linear marks that warrant a better image, though they may well be structural. I would say definitely glacially transported.

Sorry, the picture is of a clast at Craig Rhos-y-felin which hasn't been transported anywhere, the description is of the Newall Boulder. This is the "Brian John Boulder " described here:

Comparative Analysis of the "Brian John Boulder" at Craig Rhos-y-felin and the "Newall Boulder" from Stonehenge: Implications for the Origins and Transport of the Bluestones- a paper - DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28445.01769

Here it is compared to the Newall Boulder, found at Stonehenge, also from Craig Rhos-y-felin having been manuported there by the neolithic builders  of the monument.


 The shaping of the Newall boulder has nothing to do with an imaginary ice flow.


Saturday, 10 January 2026

Correcting the Corrector: The Newall Boulder is Still Not Glacial

Brian John's latest self-published critique (preprint deposited on ResearchGate, January 2026), titled The Newall boulder at Stonehenge: correcting the “corrections”, sees him lurching forth once more like Monty Python's indefatigable Black Knight – "Tis but a flesh wound!" – swinging away despite the accumulating evidence. Written in a style that repeatedly invokes "the present author" with the regal detachment of a Victorian memoir (one is almost tempted to dub him "Princess Present Author" for the monarchical flair), it is a 13-page exercise in persistence, but persistence does not equal persuasion. His bombastic use of "refute", boldly declaring in the abstract that "The contents of the paper are therefore refuted", is equally baseless: a self-published assertion without decisive counter-evidence might contest, challenge, or question, but only an egotist would claim outright refutation when even he concludes the debate remains "scientifically disputed". It recycles familiar claims while misrepresenting our peer-reviewed paper (Bevins et al., 2025, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 66: 105303), which presents new petrographic, automated SEM-EDS mineral mapping, portable XRF geochemical data, and contextual analysis to reaffirm the boulder's origin at Craig Rhos-y-Felin and dismiss glacial transport.

The piece opens with the now-familiar falsehood: our manuscript was supposedly "rejected by the Journal of Quaternary Science" before acceptance elsewhere. As previously noted, no such rejection occurred; it was submitted directly to JAS:Reports, the appropriate geoarchaeological venue, and passed standard peer review. This invention sets the tone for the rest – assertions dressed as fact, selective omissions, and a heavy reliance on blog posts as "evidence".

Here are the main points addressed systematically:

1. Provenance to Craig Rhos-y-Felin (Sections 3–4)

John claims "no convincing evidence" for a Rhos-y-Felin source, citing insufficient sampling density, no identical matches, reliance on old museum fragments, and potential mislabelling. He insists we must demonstrate that all nearby foliated rhyolite outcrops are "substantially different".

Response: Our study builds on 15+ years of cumulative work (e.g., Bevins et al. series from 2011 onward), incorporating new analyses of previously unsampled areas on the boulder. Key immobile elements (Zr, Nb, Th), mineral assemblages (foliation, spherulites, quartz phenocrysts), and textural features show strong convergence with Rhos-y-Felin rhyolite Group C. Provenancing in igneous terrains uses probabilistic multi-method matches, not identical twins across every metre – a standard approach the John ignores (cf. comparable studies on dolerites or the Altar Stone). Museum fragments are contextualised with fresh field sampling; mislabelling risks are acknowledged but do not invalidate the overall dataset. The demand for exhaustive exclusion of every nearby outcrop is unrealistic and not required in geoarchaeology.

2. Morphology and "Glacial" Features (Sections 5–6)


His Fig. 1 photo is annotated with labels such as "Fresh rock exposed in fracture scars", "Eroded facet", "Slickenside surface with quartz crystals and lineations", and "Weathered 'top' surface". He insists these are "strong indicators of glacial transport", apparently supported by a poll of 11/12 unnamed "senior geomorphologists".

Response: These features – variable facets, edge rounding, localised lineations, and fresh scars – are consistent with natural jointing in the rhyolite, prolonged surface weathering exploiting discontinuities, and human-induced breakage/percussion (e.g., small scars near the tip matching debitage from monolith shaping). Subglacial abrasion produces more uniform striae, polish, and faceting; we see none of that. The "expert poll" (non-blind, photo-based, unpublished) lacks methodological rigour – photo interpretation of geomorphology is notoriously subjective. Our high-resolution imaging and comparison to Rhos-y-Felin debitage/monolith fragments support breakage from Stone 32d (the stump), not ice transport. Senior geomorphologist input on our team (e.g., Scourse) finds no compelling glacial signature.

3. Glacial Transport and Ice Limits (Section 6)

BJ argues Bristol Channel erratics prove inland reach to Salisbury Plain, dismisses ice-rafting claims, and invokes pre-Devensian (Anglian/Wolstonian) speculation despite "abundant evidence".

Response: Far-travelled erratics in the Bristol Channel relate to coastal/rafting or limited Devensian advances – not inland chalkland penetration. BRITICE-CHRONO models and recent work (Scourse, 2024) constrain LGM limits well west/north; no ground-truthed glacial deposits (till, striated bedrock, classic erratics) exist on Salisbury Plain. Pre-Devensian ice lacks supporting stratigraphy or dating here. The boulder's context (Neolithic layers, fresh fractures) fits human debitage far better.

4. Broader Bluestone Assemblage (Sections 7–9)

John then claims 46+ lithologies prove erratic scatter, accuses bias (ignoring hammerstones/etc.), and insists most are unmodified erratics/"rubbish stones".

Response: Our focus is on monoliths and associated debitage (the monument's core). Variability is constrained to ~12–15 Preseli lithologies with multi-source origins – not random glacial randomness. "Rubbish" reflects selection/breakage processes. Claims of 12–15 "quarries" misrepresent; we identify specific extraction sites (Rhos-y-Felin, Carn Goedog) supported by excavation (Parker Pearson et al., 2019+), while the John's blog critiques lack new fieldwork.

5. Local Opportunistic Use in Wales (Section 9)

He further cites Bedd yr Afanc as evidence of local, opportunistic stone use without significance.

Response: This supports our view – Preseli stones were abundant locally and used where convenient. It does not undermine targeted selection/transport for Stonehenge.

6. Press and "Pseudo-Science" (Final sections)

The shy and retiring Brian John criticises the Aberystwyth release/media as "over-sold". We agree media can sensationalise; our paper is measured, data-led, and corrects prior errors (especially in John's 2024 piece). It adds substantial new analyses – hardly "little new information".

In summary, the Newall boulder is rhyolite debitage from Craig Rhos-y-Felin, transported by Neolithic people – not a glacial erratic. The data overwhelmingly support human transport; the glacial hypothesis lacks any credible foundation, relying on special pleading to ignore the vast moraine of counter-evidence and an unsavoury dismissal of Neolithic ingenuity and persistence simply because they are from a previous time.

Full references and data are in Bevins et al. (2025).

Thursday, 8 January 2026

A Critical Review of Peter Kokelaar's Hypothesis on Glacial Contributions to the Stonehenge Bluestones

Peter Kokelaar, a retired volcanologist and field geologist with extensive experience in the Quaternary history of the Gower Peninsula, has made a thoughtful and detailed contribution to the long-running debate over the transport of Stonehenge’s bluestones. In two online articles, Towards Stonehenge: the Anglian Glaciation of Gower and Stonehengehe argues that glacial processes, specifically the Anglian-stage Irish Sea Ice Stream (c. 450,000 years ago), played a major role in moving bluestones from their Pembrokeshire sources at least part of the way towards Salisbury Plain. While acknowledging the absence of direct proof, Kokelaar proposes that ice performed “most of the work,” depositing stones “near enough” for later Neolithic collection and incorporation into the monument. His work is richly illustrated with high-quality photographs, maps, and LiDAR imagery, reflecting sustained and meticulous field observation.

Kokelaar’s contributions deserve serious attention, particularly for their geological rigour on Gower, where he documents compelling evidence of Anglian ice overriding the peninsula, transporting far-travelled erratics, and reshaping landscapes in ways that have often been under-appreciated or misattributed to later glaciations. His work strengthens understanding of the southern reach and dynamic behaviour of the Irish Sea Ice Stream. At the same time, when these regional observations are extrapolated to Stonehenge itself, the hypothesis encounters substantial difficulties. By early 2026, the prevailing multidisciplinary consensus, drawing on geological provenancing, archaeological excavation, and Quaternary geomorphology, overwhelmingly favours deliberate Neolithic human transport from specific Preseli outcrops, with no compelling evidence for glacial delivery to the Salisbury Plain region.


Core Arguments and Their Limitations

Kokelaar’s case rests on several interconnected claims, primarily grounded in his observations on Gower and projected eastward.

Ice Flow Trajectory and Transport Capability

Kokelaar anchors his hypothesis in detailed geological observations from the Gower Peninsula, which he interprets as evidence that Anglian ice carried Pembrokeshire-derived material eastward in a direction broadly aligned towards Stonehenge. Gower provides one of the most southerly and best-exposed records of Irish Sea Ice Stream activity, and Kokelaar documents this record with considerable care.

A central line of evidence is the diverse assemblage of far-travelled erratics preserved on Gower beaches, many reworked from Anglian deposits. Kokelaar records more than twenty igneous lithologies, including gabbros consistent with St David’s Head, silicic volcanic rocks comparable to Ramsey Island, and non-spotted dolerites matching Pembrokeshire sources. Particularly significant are erratics of riebeckite microgranite derived from Ailsa Craig in western Scotland, a well-established tracer of Irish Sea Ice Stream transport. These lithologies collectively confirm long-distance entrainment, southward flow through the Irish Sea basin, and subsequent east–southeast deflection across Gower into the Bristol Channel.

Ice-flow direction is further constrained by mapped erratic dispersal patterns and geomorphological indicators. Kokelaar’s reconstructions (for example, his Figure 12) depict ice advancing from the west-northwest across Gower, a trajectory that in broad compass terms points towards southern Britain. Supporting evidence includes marine shells incorporated within till at sites such as Cockle Pot, interpreted as material entrained from Carmarthen Bay and redistributed by advancing ice. Together, these observations demonstrate that Anglian ice on Gower was thick, coherent, and dynamically capable of transporting lithologies over considerable distances.

Kokelaar also emphasises subglacial and erosional features indicative of warm-based ice overriding a karst landscape. Cave systems such as Ogof New Park exhibit sediment infill, constricted passages, and mixed corrosion features plausibly interpreted as subglacial modification. At the surface, bedrock-incised channels (for example at Melins Lake), rounded coastal cliffs, and large fluvioglacial boulders at Pwll-du point to vigorous erosion and meltwater activity during deglaciation. Fossil material associated with some Pwll-du deposits has been dated to around 425,000 years ago, consistent with an Anglian age. More broadly, Kokelaar argues that Anglian ice overrode a pre-existing marine platform on Gower, substantially modifying landforms often attributed to later (Devensian) glaciation.

These observations convincingly establish the power and reach of Anglian ice on Gower. The difficulty arises when this evidence is extended beyond the Bristol Channel.

Critique:
While regional ice-flow alignment shows that ice moved eastward across Gower, this does not in itself demonstrate penetration onto Salisbury Plain. Most glaciological reconstructions constrain the Anglian southern margin to the Bristol Channel and adjacent lowlands, with higher ground promoting thinning, stagnation, or deflection rather than sustained eastward advance. Crucially, the geomorphological and sedimentary signatures so clearly preserved on Gower, tills, erratic spreads, and subglacial erosion, are absent from Salisbury Plain and its margins, despite extensive Quaternary mapping and repeated archaeological exposure.


The Mendip Hills as a Critical Constraint

A major obstacle to Kokelaar’s mapped ice trajectory is the Mendip Hills, which occupy a key topographic position between the Bristol Channel and Salisbury Plain and are explicitly crossed by ice in his reconstructions. In mainstream Quaternary geology, however, the Mendips lie outside the direct influence of Pleistocene ice sheets, including the Anglian glaciation.

The Mendip plateau and slopes are mantled by extensive periglacial deposits, commonly termed head, rubby drift, or plateau drift, comprising angular rubble derived almost entirely from local Carboniferous limestone and adjacent bedrock. These deposits are classic products of freeze–thaw weathering and solifluction and lack the sorting, matrix support, or lithological diversity characteristic of glacial till. No confirmed far-travelled erratics from Wales, Ireland, or Scotland—and notably no Preseli-type spotted dolerite—have been recorded on the Mendip plateau or higher ground.

There is good evidence that Irish Sea ice entered the Bristol Channel during the Anglian, depositing exotic erratics on low-lying coastal sites and islands such as Flat Holm and Steep Holm, and leaving patchy tills in the Somerset lowlands. These occurrences demonstrate ice proximity, but they also underscore a consistent pattern: far-travelled material is confined to low elevations, while the hills themselves remain unaffected. Mendip landforms—gorges, dolines, dry valleys, and cave systems—are overwhelmingly attributed to karst and periglacial processes rather than ice overriding.

The Mendips rise to approximately 325 metres above sea level. For ice to have crossed the plateau, local ice thickness would need to have exceeded this elevation by a substantial margin. While continental ice sheets can certainly override relief of this scale, conditions at the southern margin of the Irish Sea Ice Stream were likely far more marginal. Kokelaar himself estimates ice thicknesses of only around 250–300 metres over low-lying Gower. Under such conditions, ice would be expected to thin rapidly against rising terrain and deflect around uplands rather than override them. The complete absence of glacial deposits or erratics on the Mendips strongly suggests that they acted as a partial barrier, diverting ice into the Somerset lowlands and along the Bristol Channel rather than permitting direct eastward flow towards Salisbury Plain.


Contrasting Gower and the Mendips

The contrast between Gower and the Mendips highlights a key methodological issue. Gower lay directly in the path of the Irish Sea Ice Stream, at low elevation and with lithologies conducive to both erosion and preservation of glacial deposits. The Mendips formed an elevated limestone massif at or beyond the effective ice margin, dominated by karstic drainage and periglacial reworking. Gower shows what Anglian ice does to landscapes it clearly overrides; the Mendips show what landscapes look like when it does not. Robust evidence from the former cannot be linearly projected across the latter without contradicting well-established geomorphological constraints.


Bluestone Morphologies and Assemblage

Kokelaar argues that the Stonehenge bluestones comprise a mixture of angular pillars and rounded, abraded forms suggestive of glacial transport. He points to stones such as the Newall and Boles Barrow boulders as potential erratics and interprets widespread debitage as evidence of a natural glacial supply gradually exhausted by builders.

Critique:

Polyhedral and pillar-like forms are readily explained by natural jointing in Preseli dolerite sills, which facilitated Neolithic quarrying with minimal shaping. Apparent surface rounding or smoothing does not, in itself, demonstrate glacial transport. In the Preseli source area, many dolerite and rhyolite blocks occur naturally as detached or partially weathered pillars and boulders with softened edges, produced by long-term chemical weathering, joint-controlled block release, and limited fluvial reworking prior to the Anglian glaciation. As a result, stones may acquire rounded or smoothed profiles in situ, before any human or glacial movement. Similar morphologies are observed at quarry sites such as Carn Goedog and Craig Rhos-y-felin, where blocks detached from outcrops already display a range of angular to moderately rounded forms. Consequently, stone shape alone cannot be taken as diagnostic of glacial transport, particularly in the absence of unequivocal subglacial features such as faceting, striations, or percussion marks. 

Detailed analyses of the Newall boulder, a foliated rhyolite excavated in 1924, demonstrate that it lacks subglacial faceting or striations and matches material quarried at Craig Rhos-y-felin. Its surface alterations are best explained by post-depositional weathering rather than ice modification. Similarly, the Boles Barrow boulder has a highly disputed provenance and context; Mike Pitts has described the archaeology of Boles Barrow as "a mess," noting significant uncertainties over whether the specimen in Salisbury Museum originated from a primary Neolithic deposit in the barrow, rendering it far from an "unequivocal erratic". Debitage patterns at Stonehenge reflect phased on-site dressing, reuse, and reworking over centuries, not dispersed glacial moraine.


Source Specificity and the Nunatak Hypothesis

The dominance of spotted dolerite from specific eastern Preseli outcrops poses a further problem for glacial models. Kokelaar suggests that these outcrops protruded as nunataks, enabling selective supraglacial transport.

Critique:
While partial nunatak exposure is plausible, no evidence supports the transport of megalith-sized blocks over 200 km supraglacially in sufficient numbers and lithological purity to account for the Stonehenge assemblage. The complete absence of spotted dolerite erratics beyond Preseli—despite extensive surveys—remains a critical weakness for any glacial explanation.


Archaeological Evidence for Human Transport

Kokelaar questions the interpretation of Neolithic quarries at Carn Goedog and Craig Rhos-y-felin and emphasises the absence of preserved transport routes.

Critique:

Excavations have revealed extraction platforms, removal scars, stone tools, loading features, and radiocarbon dates around 3400–3000 BC, consistent with Stonehenge’s early phases. Geochemical provenance is precise and non-random. While transport logistics remain debated, human movement of large stones over long distances is well attested in Neolithic Britain and fits the cultural context of monumentality and interregional connection.


Claims Regarding the Altar Stone

Kokelaar extends his glacial perspective to the Altar Stone (Stone 80), accepting its Scottish provenance but challenging the northeastern constraint proposed in recent studies. He argues that detrital zircon U-Pb age spectra, central to the 2024 identification, could equally match sediments from southwest or central Scotland (southwest of the Great Glen Fault), derived from erosion of Grampian Highland rocks. This broader sourcing, he suggests, aligns better with Anglian Irish Sea Ice Stream transport of Scottish material southward. This interpretation, while highlighting potential overlaps in zircon inheritance, is selective: it engages only with zircon data and overlooks the multi-proxy evidence (including apatite and rutile trace-element chemistry, mineral fabrics, and stratigraphic context) that robustly constrains the Altar Stone to Old Red Sandstone of the Orcadian Basin in northeast Scotland.


Conclusion

Peter Kokelaar’s articles represent a serious and informed challenge from an independent geologist deeply familiar with the Quaternary history of southwest Wales. His work on Gower significantly enriches understanding of Anglian glaciation and rightly cautions against dismissing natural processes in favour of purely anthropogenic explanations. However, the extension of this regional evidence to Stonehenge involves substantial extrapolation across terrain, most notably the Mendip Hills, that shows no trace of glacial overriding. The hybrid model, in which ice performs “most of the work” before depositing stones “near enough,” relies on assumptions that remain difficult to test and unsupported by positive evidence.

In contrast, the human-transport model is underpinned by targeted quarry archaeology, precise provenance matching, and a coherent cultural framework. Kokelaar’s revival of the glacial hypothesis remains an intriguing and valuable provocation, but one that does not displace the accumulated multidisciplinary evidence favouring deliberate Neolithic transport of the bluestones to Stonehenge.

References

  • Bevins, R., Ixer, R. A., Pearce, N., Scourse, J., & Daw, T. (2023). Lithological description and provenancing of a collection of bluestones from excavations at Stonehenge by William Hawley in 1924 with implications for the human versus ice transport debate of the monument’s bluestone megaliths. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 38(6), 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21971
  • Richard E. Bevins, Nick J.G. Pearce, Rob A. Ixer, James Scourse, Tim Daw, Mike Parker Pearson, Mike Pitts, David Field, Duncan Pirrie, Ian Saunders, Matthew Power. The enigmatic ‘Newall boulder’ excavated at Stonehenge in 1924: New data and correcting the record. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports,Volume 66, 2025, 105303, ISSN 2352-409X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105303 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25003360)
  • Kokelaar, P. (n.d.-a). Towards Stonehenge: the Anglian glaciation of Gower. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://kokelaargower.com/towards-stonehenge-the-anglian-glaciation-of-gower/
  • Kokelaar, P. (n.d.-b). Stonehenge. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://kokelaargower.com/stonehenge/ 
  • Pearson, Mike Parker, Josh Pollard, Colin Richards, Kate Welham, Chris Casswell, Charles French, and others, ‘Megalith Quarries for Stonehenge’s Bluestones’, Antiquity, 93 (2019), 45–62 http://dx.doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.111
  • Scourse, J.D. (1997). Transport of the Stonehenge bluestones: Testing the glacial hypothesis. In B. Cunliffe & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Science and Stonehenge (Proceedings of the British Academy 92, pp. 271–314). Oxford University Press.
  • Thorpe, R.S., Williams-Thorpe, O., Jenkins, D.G., & Watson, J.S. (1991). The geological sources of the Stonehenge bluestones. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 10(2), 127–148.

The Stonehenge Diet – America’s Prescription for Healthy Living

 The Stonehenge Diet


In January 2026, the United States took a dramatic step in public health policy. The new Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030, unveiled by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., effectively inverted the old food pyramid. Protein from animal sources, healthy fats, full-fat dairy, vegetables, and fruits now form the broad, recommended base of the diet. Added sugars, ultra-processed foods, and even whole grains are sharply limited or relegated to the narrow apex.

It was a striking reversal of decades-old advice. Yet, remarkably, this “new” approach bears an uncanny resemblance to the eating patterns of people who lived 4,500 years ago on Salisbury Plain – the builders and users of Stonehenge.

The primary evidence comes from Durrington Walls, the large seasonal settlement just three kilometres north-east of Stonehenge, occupied around 2500 BC. Excavations there have revealed a diet overwhelmingly centred on animal foods. Pig bones dominate the faunal remains, often comprising 60–70% of the total, with cattle a strong second. Many pigs were slaughtered at nine months old, pointing to organised midwinter feasts where communities from across Britain converged.

Lipid analysis of Grooved Ware pottery shows that large vessels were used for pork fats, while smaller ones contained dairy residues – evidence of milk, butter, cheese, or yoghurt. Even coprolites (preserved human and dog faeces) indicate consumption of nutrient-dense offal.

By contrast, evidence for cultivated cereals at Durrington Walls is surprisingly sparse. The most common plant remains are gathered wild foods: hazelnut shells, sloes, crab apples, and other seasonal fruits and berries. A new archaeobotanical project, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s RICHeS programme and announced in early 2026, is re-examining charred plant remains to identify these wild resources in greater detail and reconstruct the surrounding woodland.

What emerges is a pattern that aligns closely with America’s freshly revised guidelines: abundant high-quality animal protein, healthy animal fats, full-fat dairy, and modest amounts of seasonal plant foods – with minimal reliance on grains.

The Stonehenge builders were not following government recommendations, of course. They were responding to their environment, their seasonal rhythms, and the practical demands of feeding large gatherings. Yet their choices produced a diet that modern science is now rediscovering as robust and metabolically sound.

Perhaps the real lesson is simple: when official advice finally catches up with both ancestral practice and emerging evidence, it often looks less like innovation and more like a return to what worked all along. The “Stonehenge Diet” – heavy on meat, dairy, and wild plants, light on cereals – may turn out to be America’s latest prescription, but it is also one of humanity’s oldest.

The Veggie Options at the Stonehenge Feast

The people who constructed Stonehenge around 2500 BC are thought to have lived primarily at Durrington Walls, a large Neolithic settlement roughly three kilometres north-east of the monument. Archaeological evidence from this site paints a picture of a diet heavily centred on animal products, particularly during large seasonal gatherings that may have drawn participants from across Britain.

A new research project, announced in early January 2026, promises to add important detail to this picture by focusing on the plant component of the diet. Led by Dr Catherine Longford with contributions from archaeobotanist Ellen Simmons, the study will reanalyse charred plant remains and wood charcoal from Durrington Walls using high-resolution microscopy and access to specialist reference collections. Funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s RICHeS Access Fund Catalyst, the work aims to identify wild plant foods more precisely and reconstruct the surrounding woodland environment.

As Ellen Simmons noted: “Support from RICHeS will enable higher-level identification of wild seed remains, with benefits for wider research into the Neolithic.” Further details are available in the RICHeS announcement and the University of Sheffield news release.

A Meat-Heavy Diet and Seasonal Feasting

Excavations at Durrington Walls have recovered tens of thousands of animal bones. Pigs dominate the assemblage, often making up 60–70% of the remains, with cattle a distant second. Many pigs were slaughtered at around nine months old, pointing to large-scale midwinter feasts – piglets born in spring would reach prime size by winter.

Isotope analysis of pig bones has shown that animals were brought from distant regions, including Scotland and north-east England, suggesting that gatherings at Durrington Walls served as occasions for communities from across Britain to converge. English Heritage summarises much of this evidence in its overview of food and feasting at Stonehenge.

Lipid residues in Grooved Ware pottery further illuminate cooking practices. Larger vessels frequently contained pork fats, while smaller ones held dairy residues – evidence of milk, butter, cheese or yoghurt. A detailed study of these residues was published in Antiquity in 2015: Feeding Stonehenge: cuisine and consumption at the Late Neolithic site of Durrington Walls.

Evidence even extends to human waste. Analysis of mineralised coprolites (ancient faeces) from the site revealed parasitic eggs consistent with consumption of raw or undercooked internal organs. One coprolite belonged to a dog fed the same offal as humans, confirming the practice. The findings were reported in Parasitology and widely covered, including by the BBC in 2022

The Limited Role of Plant Foods

While Neolithic communities elsewhere in Britain cultivated wheat and barley, evidence for cereal crops at Durrington Walls itself is surprisingly sparse. Most recovered plant remains are from gathered wild resources: hazelnut shells are the most common, alongside occasional sloes, crab apples and other wild fruits.

This pattern has long puzzled researchers. The settlement’s seasonal, feast-oriented character may explain the emphasis on meat, but everyday plant consumption remains poorly understood – hence the importance of the new project.

By examining charred seeds and wood charcoal in greater detail, the current study hopes to identify specific wild plants used in both daily meals and ceremonial feasting, as well as map the ecological zones and resource networks exploited across Neolithic Britain.

The results will not only refine our understanding of diet but also contribute to reconstructing the landscape around Stonehenge at the time – a landscape that has since changed dramatically.

Sunday, 4 January 2026

The Quest for the Altar Stone Source

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/stonehenge-altar-stone-richard-bevins-b2889034.html

Inside the quest for the origin of Stonehenge’s Altar Stone

After Orkney was ruled out as the origin for Stonehenge’s Altar Stone, geologists now have their eyes on north eastern Scotland


.. Prof Bevins is staring at a mapped area 125 miles by 93 miles, determined to discover the exact location the stone was quarried, before being transported more than 500 miles to the West Country.


The Orcadian Basin, where there are old red sandstone deposits believed to be the source of the altar stone - Mike Norton/Wiki Commons

“When we publish a paper [on Stonehenge] you can almost clock it going around the world across time zones. News, television channels, online. It really is quite astonishing. We’re hoping to achieve the same results again soon.”