I completely agree that “pure people power” (plus rollers, levers and a lot of coordinated effort) was almost certainly the main story for the big sarsens.
That said, the recent isotopic work on the young female cow tooth from Stonehenge’s ditch has added a really interesting extra strand for the earlier bluestone phase. The strontium signatures point to her having maybe come from the Preseli area in Wales — exactly the same source region as the bluestones — and she was there around the right time. The lead spike in her enamel is open to more than one interpretation; it could be calving stress, but it’s also the sort of signature that can appear with other physiological demands.
On sarsen.org I’ve floated a very tentative, speculative thought that perhaps a few cattle played a supporting role in the broader logistics of getting the (much smaller and lighter) bluestones to the site — not teams of oxen yoked up dragging multi-tonne stones for hundreds of miles, but maybe helping with shorter hauls, local manoeuvring on site, or simply travelling with the human group. The wider European evidence for some early cattle traction in megalithic contexts makes it worth at least considering, even if a major new British osteological study suggests heavy, routine traction wasn’t common in the Neolithic here.
None of this contradicts the central importance of human labour — it just adds a possible extra tool in the Neolithic toolkit for certain tasks or phases. One tooth obviously doesn’t rewrite the whole story, and I’m very happy to be wrong!
I’ve written more about the tooth and the thinking here: https://www.sarsen.org/2026/02/a-speculative-hypothesis-neolithic.html and the follow-up here: https://www.sarsen.org/2026/03/the-ox-that-moved-mountain-or-didnt.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome on fresh posts - you just need a Google account to do so.