www.Sarsen.org
A Contrarian’s Obsessive Guide to Stonehenge’s Latest Research
Wednesday, 4 March 2026
The Slaughter Stone Legend: Iron Oxides, Algae, and the “Blood” Pools of Stonehenge
›
For generations, the Slaughter Stone (Stone 95) at Stonehenge has captivated imaginations with its pools of vivid red rainwater collecting ...
Tuesday, 3 March 2026
What the REF doesn't see
›
Earley, B. (2026) ‘The popularity of “new antiquarianism” challenges how we understand research impact’, LSE Impact of Social Sciences Blo...
Saturday, 28 February 2026
Scientific Fact-Check: Could the white tufa patches on Newall’s Boulder be the “fingerprints” of Stonehenge’s Neolithic builders?
›
I asked Grok for a rigorous fact-check of the blog post at https://www.sarsen.org/2024/06/are-these-fingerprints-of-builders-of.html , with ...
Stonehenge: Secrets of the New Stone
›
Sample MS3 Channel 5 will air Stonehenge: Secrets of the New Stone on Tuesday 3 March 2026 at 9pm. The one-hour programme, presented by Tud...
Tuesday, 24 February 2026
Battling Bullshit with Bayes and Brandolini
›
We can give fringe views far too much credence by applying false equivalence rather than proper Bayesian reasoning . We should assign prior...
Sunday, 22 February 2026
Review of Clarke et al. (2026) ‘Altar to Attic to Analysis: Geochemical Authentication of a Rediscovered Victorian Thin Section of Stonehenge’s Altar Stone’
›
Anthony J.I. Clarke, Christopher L. Kirkland, Arthur de Oliveira Vicentini, Lisa Brown, Altar to Attic to Analysis: Geochemical Authenticati...
Correcting Brian John's Silly Mistake
›
Last year Brian John published a paper in Archaeology in Wales Vol 63 arguing that “ Carn Goedog on Mynydd Preseli Was Not the Site of a Bl...
›
Home
View web version