tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5787185370858787658.post4371612652882926756..comments2024-01-30T06:35:10.103+00:00Comments on www.Sarsen.org: Plan of Cremations at StonehengeTim Dawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10667360714222841797noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5787185370858787658.post-59124815196546691352016-02-04T10:46:10.990+00:002016-02-04T10:46:10.990+00:00The interesting aspect of the cremations (which hi...The interesting aspect of the cremations (which historically in other cultures came after excarnations) is that they are buried in the Aubrey Holes - which clearly were empty at the time of burial (so a natural place to bury the remains). Consequently, logic (something lacking in archaeological theories) would indicate something must have been in the holes PRIOR to the cremations. <br /><br />The problem for the 'experts' is that the Aubrey Holes existed before the ditch by at least 500 years and if the bluestones (as the hole size indicate) filled the holes then the AH's could have been there thousands of years before the cremations filled the holes.<br /><br />All this evidence indicate that the dates for Phase I to III of Stonehenge are complete nonsense - which the recent excavation at Craig Rhos-y-felin reinforces, if you accept that a majority of the carbon dating and ALL of the hearths are Mesolithic in date.<br /><br />RJLBobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16886732338349957214noreply@blogger.com